|
|
Former Chanute Air Force Base Environmental Restoration Program
Fact Sheet #2
April 1999
Rantoul, Illinois
Introduction
This is the second of a series of Illinois EPA fact beets to acquaint you
with the environmental restoration program at the former Chanute Air Force Base
(AFB). These fact sheets contain information regarding various topics
of concern; including site history, site status; and any site-specific issues
which need to be addressed in a timely manner. The purpose of this fact sheet
is to discuss the remedial investigation (RI) to be conducted on Landfills 1;
2, 3; and 4 in Operable Unit 2 (OU-2) at the former Chanute Air Ford Base (AFB)
in Rantoul Illinois, in order to establish if these landfills
pose an unacceptable risk to human health and/or the environment.
The U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program
The objective of the U.S. Air Force Installation Restoration Program (IRP)
is to assess past hazardous waste disposal and spill sites at Air Force installations,
and to develop remedial actions consistent with the National Contingency Plan
(NCP) for sites that pose a threat to human health and welfare or the environment.
The 1976 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) is one of the primary
federal laws governing the disposal of hazardous wastes. This law requires federal
agencies to comply with local and state environmental regulations and to provide
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) concerning past disposal practices
at federal sites. RCRA also requires state agencies to inventory past hazardous
waste disposal sites and to provide information to the USEPA concerning those
sites.
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA
or "Superfund") was enacted by Congress in 1980. CERCLA outlines the responsibility
for identifying and remediating contaminated sites in the United States. CERCLA
identifies the USEPA as the primary policy and enforcement agency regarding
contaminated sites.
The 1986 Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) extends and modifies
the requirements of CERCLA with respect to goals for remediation and the steps
that lead to the selection of a remedial process. SARA is the primary legislation
governing remedial action at past hazardous waste disposal sites.
Executive Order 12580, adopted in 1987, gave various federal agencies, including
the Department of Defense (DOD), the responsibility to act as lead agencies
for conducting investigations and implementing remediation efforts when they
are the sole or co-contributor to contamination on or off their properties.
To ensure compliance with CERCLA, its regulations, and Executive Order 12580,
the DOD developed the IRP, under the Defense Environmental Restoration Program,
to identify potentially contaminated sites, investigate these sites, and evaluate
and select remedial actions for potentially contaminated facilities. The IRP
is the DOD's primary mechanism for response actions on Air Force installations
affected by the provisions of SARA. Over the years, requirements of the IRP
have been developed and modified to ensure that DOD compliance with federal
laws and regulations such as RCRA, CERCLA, SARA, and the NCP can be met.
Waste Disposal Activities at Chanute AFB
Limited historical information is available regarding past waste disposal activities
at Chanute Air Force Base, particularly during the early years of operation.
During 1930s and 1940s, waste generated at the AFB was disposed primarily by
placing waste material and refuse in open dumps. Flammable materials such as
fuels, solvents, and oils were often disposed by using them for firefighting
training activities. In the 1950s and 1960s, waste disposal activities began
to shift over to utilization of landfills where waste materials were placed
in excavated trenches and covered with soil. Landfills 1, 2, 3, and 4 at the
Base were used in chronological and numerical order; that is, the first open
dump area utilized for receiving and burning waste (in the 1930s) is now referred
to as Landfill 1, and the last open dump area utilized for receiving and burning
waste (in the early 1970s) is referred to as Landfill 4. Landfills 1, 2, 3,
and 4 are located in the southeast portion of the Base. Each landfill comprises
an area of roughly 20 acres and each is filled to a depth of approximately 3
to 12 feet. Since the 1970s, hazardous waste materials (typically solvents and
degreasers) have been removed from the Base by licensed waste haulers. Since
the waste disposal activities have ceased, the land surface at the four landfills
has experienced differential settling, resulting in areas of ponded water during
wet periods of the year. The following provides a brief description of the history
of each of the four landfills:
- Landfill 1 received the majority of the wastes generated at the Base
during the early years of operation of 1941 through 1960. The wastes were
routinely burned and were deposited at a depth of 8 to 10 feet. Landfill 1
received garbage, paper, wood, metal, ashes, aircraft parts, unrinsed pesticide
containers, construction/demolition debris, and various shop wastes, including
solvents.
- Landfill 2 was in operation from the early 1950s through 1967. Landfill
2 received the same types of waste as Landfill 1 and may have been where four
drums containing 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and/or 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic
acid and 50 one-ounce wax-encased sealed containers of zinc phosphide were
disposed. The wastes were occasionally burned and were deposited at a depth
of approximately 8 to 10 feet.
- Landfill 3 was in operation from 1967 to 1970 and received garbage,
refuse, shop wastes and possibly the four drums of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic
acid and/or 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid. The wastes were occasionally
burned and deposited at a depth of 6 to 8 feet.
- Landfill 4 was in operation from 1970 to 1974 and received Base
garbage, refuse, shop wastes, and construction/demolition debris. Wastes were
infrequently burned and deposited at a depth of 8 to 10 feet.
Previous Investigative Activities at Chanute AFB
The first hazardous waste investigation at Chanute AFB under the Installation
Restoration Plan was conducted in 1982. This initial investigation (considered
Phase I) included interviews with past and present Base employees and facility
inspections. By 1983, six sites were discovered through this initial assessment.
From 1984 to 1986, confirmation and quantification studies were done at these
six sites. An additional site was discovered during this time. From 1987 through
1993, Remedial Investigative (RI) fieldwork at the original seven sites and
at four additional sites (including Salt Fork Creek) was done. A new IRP site
was discovered in 1990. The objective of this fieldwork was to confirm the presence
or absence of contamination at these individual with histories of waste disposal,
spills, and leaks. Activities included monitoring well installation, groundwater
and hydrologic sampling, and a geophysical survey.
(Note: At this time, several IRP and underground storage tank
(UST) sites have been identified at Chanute AFB; in addition to the four landfills,
there are two fire training areas, fourteen oil/water separators, one trichloroethylene
(solvent) spill, one sludge disposal pit, 66 USTs, and two fuel transfer lines.)
Description of Current Remedial Investigation
The primary purposes of the Landfills RI are to:
- determine the presence or absence of hazardous waste within Landfills 1,
2, 3, and 4; and
- determine the nature and extent of contamination associated with the landfills,
in order to establish if these landfills pose unacceptable risk to human health
or the environment.
This investigation includes two adjacent ecosystems -- Salt Fork Creek and
Heritage Lake. A related objective of the current study is to collect sufficient
information to evaluate the feasibility of potential remedial action alternatives
for Landfills 1, 2, 3, and 4; Salt Fork Creek; and Heritage Lake, as necessary
based on the results of the Landfills RI.
Conceptual Site Model Development
As previously stated, all of the analytical data and most of the geologic/hydrogeologic
data collected doing the previous RI activities have been rejected due to concerns
over data quality. As a result, a conceptual site model was developed to represent
a hypothetical landfill that may be in hydraulic connection with an area creek
and lake. Utilizing what data was "usable" and noting key observations for the
Landfills, Salt Fork Creek, and Heritage lake, the diagram on Page 4 illustrates
the Conceptual Site Model, including potential migration pathways.
- Landfill contaminants have migrated to soils and may have migrated to air,
surface water, sediments, and groundwater.
- Landfill soils have become contaminated by contact with wastes.
- Soil particulants and volatile constituents may enter the air, where they
may be transported relatively short distances by the wind.
- Contaminated surface soils and dissolved soil or waste contaminants also
may be transported by surface runoff from the landfills.
- Runoff may enter Salt Fork Creek by a relatively direct route in the cases
of Landfills 1 and 2, or through the surface water drainage system in the
cases of Landfills 3 and 4.
- Contaminants in the creek may be adsorbed by sediments and/or transported
by stream flow.
- Heritage Lake is at a higher elevation and should not receive runoff from
any of the landfills.
- Because of the thin soil covers on the landfill and the shallow water table,
leachate production within the landfills is likely to have occurred by rain
infiltration, snow melt, and by leaching of submerged landfill contents.
- Seepage into surface water and into soils are anticipated.
Landfills RI: Conceptual Site Model Cross Section

Larger View
Contaminant Exposure and Pathways
Soil/Debris
Base workers occasionally working on or near the landfills may be exposed
to contaminants in surface soils or surface debris. The general public may be
exposed to contaminated soils or surface debris during trespassing since the
landfills are easily accessible from roads. Current farming activities on the
periphery of Landfill 1 could also result in exposure to surface soils. Since
the landfills support sucessional vegetative communities and a diverse community
of wildlife, these plants and animals may potentially be exposed to soil contaminants.
Groundwater
All human and ecological receptors potentially exposed to contaminated groundwater
will be evaluated as part of the risk assessment. Additional groundwater sampling
of off-site private drinking water wells was conducted in March 1999; the Air
Force Base is expected to provide those sampling results to the homeowners the
first week in April.
Surface Water/Sediments
Base workers occasionally working in or near Salt Fork Creek and Heritage
lake may be exposed to contaminants in surface water and sediments. The general
public may be exposed to contaminated surface water and sediments in Salt Fork
Creek during recreational-type activities since the creek is easily accessible
from roads and the Heritage Lake area. The general public may be exposed to
contaminants in Hertiage Lake surface water and sediment during recreational
activities permitted at the lake. Fish consumption is a possible exposure route
for both Salt Fork Creek and Hertiage Lake. Plants and animals may potentially
exposed to surface ater and sediment contaminants.
Leachate
The general public could be exposed to leachate (a contaminated liquid resulting
when water percolates, or trickles, through waste materials and collects components
of those wastes) seeps along the banks of Salt Fork Creek since it is easily
accessible; maintenance workers could occasionally be exposed to seeps. Since
Salt Fork Creek supports a diverse community of wildlife, these plants and animals
may potentially be exposed to leachate at and downstream of seep locations.
Air and Landfill Gas
Receptors for each of the media discussed above may also be exposed to contaminants
in the air. Receptors for surface and subsurface soils may be exposed to contaminants
entering by volatilization and particulate emmisions from soils. Receptors for
water pathways maybe exposed to contaminants entering air from volitization
from water.
Contaminants of Concern
All detected organic compounds will be considered Contaminants of Concern (COCs)
for the medium in which they are detected. Organic chemicals which could be
present in the landfills include volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatile
organic compounds (SVOCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), chlorinated
pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), herbicides, and dioxins/furans.
Data for inorganic parameters will be compared to background concentrations.
All detected inorganic parameters in Heritage Lake water and sediments will
be considered potential COCs and carried through the risk assessment. If calucations
show that any inorganic parameters appear to present unacceptable human health
or ecological risk, further evaluaton will be undertaken to assess whether concentrations
of these parameters in the lake exceed typical local levels. All inorganic parameters
with maximum concentrations that exceed background upper tolerance limits will
be considered potiential COCs for the human health and ecological risk assessments.
Inorganic compounds which could be present in the landfills include metals.
Note: List of Potential Contaminants of Concern in Soil and
Water found on page 7 of this Fact Sheet. (These listed chemicals have been
detected in soil and water sampling conducted at the Landfills during the Spring
of 1998.)
List of Potential Contaminants of Concern
| Volatiles |
Acetone
Benzene
Carbon Disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Isopropylbenzene
M,p-Xylene (Sum of Isomers)
Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)
Methylene Chloride |
N-Butylbenzene
N-Propylbenzene
O-Xylene (1,2-Dimethylbenzene)
O-Xylene (1,2-Dimethylbenzene)
P-Cymene (P-Isopropyltoluene)
Sec-Butylbenzene
Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)
Toluene
Trichloroethylene (TCE) |
| Semi-Volatiles |
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo Butyl Phthalate
Bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
Chrysene
Di-N-Butyl Phthalate
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran |
Diethyl Phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Trichoroethylene (TCE)
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylnaphthalene
4-Methylphenol (p-Cresol) |
| Pesticides/PCBs |
Aldrin
Alpha-Endosulfan
Alpha-Chlordane
Beta Endosulfan
Beta BHC (Beta Hexachlorocyclohexane)
Delta BHC (Delta Hexachlorocyclohexane)
Dieldrin
Gamma BHC (Lindane)
Gamma Chlordane
Heptachlor |
Heptachlor Epoxide
MCPA
MCPP
Methoxychlor
P,P'-DDD
P,P'-DDE
P,P'-DDT
PCB-1242 (Arochlor 1242)
PCB-1254 (Arochlor 1254) |
| Metals |
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium(Total)
Cobalt |
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum |
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc |
| Dioxins/Furans |
Heptachlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins (Total)
Heptachlorinated Dibenzofurans (Total)
Hexachlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins (Total)
Hexachlorinated Dibenzofurans (Total)
Octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
Octachlorodibenzofuran
Pentachlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins (Total)
Pentachlorinated Dibenzofurans (Total)
Tetrachlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins (Total)
Tetrachlorinated Dibenzofurans (Total)
1,2,3,4,6, 7, 8-Heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
1, 2, 3 , 4, 7, 8-Hexachloro dibenzo-p-dioxin
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
1,2, 3, 6, 7, 8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
1, 2, 3 , 7, 8, 9-Hexachloro dib enzo-p-dioxin
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
1, 2,3, 7, 8-Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
1,2, 3, 7, 8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran |
Opportunities for Public Participation
Members of the community can become involved in the environmental program
at the former Chanute Air Force Base by attending the Restoration Advisory Board
(RAB) meetings which are held the Thursday of the first full week (which includes
a Sunday) of every other month at 7:00 p.m. at the Rantoul Aviation Center.
The RAB is an advisory group which acts as a focal point for the exchange of
information between the Air Force, Illinois EPA, U.S. EPA, and the local community
regarding restoration activities. The RAB is intended to bring together community
members who reflect the diverse interests within that local community; the RAB
is the vehicle to identify concerns, values, and needs between the affected
community and the installation.
The next Chanute AFB RAB meeting is being held on April 8, 1999, at 7:00 p.m.
at the Rantoul Aviation Center.
You are also invited to learn more about site history and activities by visiting
the Information Repository located at the Base Library on the former Chanute
Air Force Base. The Repository contains copies of the technical documents and
summaries, fact sheets, news releases, the community relations plan, and other
site-specific information.
| Library Hours |
Library Phone Number |
| Monday-Thursday |
10:30 am - 9:00 pm |
217/495-3192 |
| Friday |
10:30 am - 6:00 pm |
|
| Saturday and Sunday |
12 noon - 6:00 pm |
|
For Additional Information
Ron Steward
Remedial Project Manager
Illinois EPA
1021 N. Grand Ave. E.
Springfield, IL 62794-9276
217/524-3279 |
Gary Schafer
Remedial Project Manager
U.S. EPA - Region V
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, IL 60604
312/353-8827 |
|
|