|
|
Changes to Clean Construction or Demolition Debris
(CCDD) Requirements
(Last Updated August 4, 2011)
On July 29, 2011, Illinois EPA filed its proposal to
amend 35 Ill. Adm. Code Part 1100 with the Illinois Pollution Control Board. As
part of the formal rulemaking, the Board has established a web page where you can
view or download the proposed amendments. This is also where the Board will post
its opinions and orders, hearing officer orders, hearing testimony, and public
comments.
Case R2012-009
In the Matter of: Proposed Amendments to Clean Construction or Demolition Debris
Fill Operations Under PA 96-1416 & 97-0137: 35 Ill. Adm. Code Part 1100
To register for updates to the Board's rulemaking, go to their
web page and click
on the hyperlinked text that says, "Notify me when this case is updated." This
text is located in the box titled, View Case Details.
To learn more about the rulemaking process please go to the
Citizen's Guide to the Illinois Pollution Control Board - Rulemakings
page.
Future testimony, responses to questions and comments, or other documents
prepared by Illinois EPA related to this rulemaking will only be available from
the Board's webpage.
The only new information expected to be posted here will be related to
implementation of the Interim Standards, such as revised forms and answers to
frequently asked questions.
The Rulemaking ProcessWhy are regulations needed?
On July 30, 2010, Public Act 96-1416 became law. This CCDD law requires Illinois
EPA to propose rules to establish additional technical requirements for CCDD
facilities; set operating standards for uncontaminated soil fill operations; and
develop standards for the maximum allowable concentrations of chemical
constituents in uncontaminated soil generated during construction or demolition activities and
used as fill material at either type of fill site. Illinois EPA must file the
proposed rules with the Illinois Pollution Control Board no later than July 30, 2011.
Who will be affected?
Owners and operators of CCDD facilities and uncontaminated soil fill operations
as well as governmental entities, road builders, landscapers, and other
contractors and excavators that deliver CCDD or uncontaminated soil generated from
construction or demolition activities to CCDD facilities and uncontaminated soil
fill operations.
May I comment on the draft rules or propose alternative language?
Yes. You will have many opportunities to comment, ask questions, and propose
alternative language.
Between now and July 30, 2011, Illinois EPA will seek and consider input from a
diverse set of stakeholder groups. You are advised to work through your
respective professional organization for greater efficiency and impact. Please be assured
we will listen to all concerns. Illinois EPA’s goal is to craft a rule that is
fair and workable while also sufficiently protective of the environment.
Here’s the timeline of informal outreach activity by Illinois EPA:
| February 17 |
Release the draft rule to
stakeholder
groups and invite comments |
| March 11 |
Stakeholder comments due on the draft rule |
| April 29 |
Release
revised draft rule to stakeholder groups and invite
comments |
| May 12 |
Stakeholder comments due on the revised draft rule |
| June 30 |
Finalize proposed rule for sign-off by Illinois EPA Director and the
Governor’s Office |
| July 30 |
File proposal with the Illinois Pollution Control Board |
To meet the May 12 stakeholder due date, send your comments on the
draft rule to epa.ccddcomments@illinois.gov.
When submitting comments on the draft rule, please observe the following:
- Address all comments to
epa.ccddcomments@illinois.gov
- If you are submitting comments from a trade association or professional
organization, please prioritize your group’s concerns and, as much as possible,
organize the comments you receive from members.
-
Be specific and propose alternative language where applicable.
The proposal to be filed by Illinois EPA in July 2011 is NOT the final
regulation. July 30, 2011 marks the start of the formal rulemaking process,
which is administered by a separate entity, the Illinois Pollution Control Board. From that point
forward, all comments must be directed to the Board.
Who decides what the final regulations will look like?
The Illinois Pollution Control Board. The Board will schedule at least two
hearings, one in Springfield and the other in Chicago. There will be
opportunities to testify at these hearings, ask questions, and submit comments. As before, you are advised
to work through your respective professional organization for greater efficiency
and impact. The CCDD law requires that the Board adopt the rules no later than July
30, 2012.
How can I stay informed of the rule’s progress?
Between now and July 30, 2011, Illinois EPA will coordinate its outreach through
stakeholder groups. We will also post the draft rule on our website, though we
are not inviting comments from individuals online.
After July 30, 2011, the proposed rule will be managed by the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, and all updates and opportunities to comment will come from the
Board. Shortly after the Board assigns a Docket number to the rulemaking, you will be
able to visit the Board’s website and view a separate
webpage
specific to this rulemaking. Once there, you will be able to click on View File
to bring up the proposed rule and all relevant documents. You may also request
to be
placed on the Board's Notice List or Service List by clicking on Notify Me next
to the Case Activity Heading.
How the Revised Draft Rule is Organized
(Updated
April 29, 2011)
The proposed rule will amend 35 Ill. Adm. Code Part 1100 to include
uncontaminated soil fill operations and set new requirements for the management
of CCDD and uncontaminated soil at fill sites. Right now, the existing 35 Ill. Adm. Code
Part 1100 applies to CCDD facilities only.
As drafted, the amendments to 35 Ill. Adm. Code Part 1100 are organized into
seven Subparts. A brief description of each Subpart follows.
Subpart A: General
This Subpart adds “uncontaminated soil” and “uncontaminated soil fill
operations” to the applicability and contains new definitions for “compliance
boundary,” “compliance point,” “potentially impacted property," "representative
groundwater conditions," "source site operator,” and “source site owner.” The term “other excavation” has been
expanded, and copied out of the larger
definition for “CCDD fill operation” and placed on its own for ease of use and understanding.
Subpart B: Operating Standards for CCDD Fill Operations
This Subpart describes how CCDD facilities are to be operated and includes the
new requirements for soil certifications by source site owners and operators,
professional engineers, and professional geologists.
Subpart C: Permit Application Information for CCDD Fill Operations
This Subpart has no significant changes.
Subpart D: Procedural Requirements for Permitting CCDD Fill Operations
This Subpart now requires three years of groundwater monitoring to confirm that
the CCDD fill operation has not contributed to an exceedance of the
Class I groundwater quality standards as a condition for terminating the CCDD
facility permit. This requirement will become effective one year from the date
of the adoption of the proposed rules to allow facilities to close before
groundwater monitoring is required.
Subpart E: Uncontaminated Soil Fill Operations
This new Subpart provides operating standards and requirements for
uncontaminated soil fill operations, which are not issued permits by Illinois
EPA. Instead, as required by the CCDD law, uncontaminated soil fill operations are required to
register their fill sites with Illinois EPA. For this reason, the closure and
post-closure periods for uncontaminated soil fill operations are self-implementing with no
Illinois EPA oversight. The owner or operator must submit an affidavit to
Illinois EPA along with a professional engineer certification that the closure and post-closure
periods have complied with the regulations. All of the other operating standards
– such as the load checking, soil certification, and recordkeeping requirements – mirror
the requirements for CCDD facilities.
Subpart F: Standards for Uncontaminated Soil Used as Fill Material at Regulated
Fill Operations
This new Subpart lays out the methodology for the numerical standards used to
determine whether or not soil generated from construction or demolition
activities is uncontaminated and may be used as fill material at CCDD facilities and
uncontaminated soil fill operations.
Subpart G: Groundwater Monitoring
This new Subpart applies to both CCDD facilities and uncontaminated soil fill
operations. The Subpart requires groundwater monitoring and establishes the
procedures to be followed in the event that the fill operation causes the Class I groundwater standards
to be exceeded.
These groundwater requirements are self-implementing.
Key Provisions of the 35 Ill. Adm. Code Part 1100 Amendments
(Updated April 29,
2011)1. Requires a source site owner and operator, professional engineer
or professional geologist to
certify that soil generated from construction or demolition activities and taken
to a fill operation is uncontaminated.
This requirement comes from the Interim Standards established by the CCDD law,
which have been in place since July 30, 2010. The Part 1100 amendments continue the certification requirement by placing it into the operating
standards for CCDD facilities and uncontaminated soil fill operations. The
revised draft rule provides for certification by professional geologists.
2. Establishes a method for determining numerical standards for uncontaminated
soil.
The numerical standards for uncontaminated soil are based on the most stringent
cleanup objectives established in 35 Ill. Adm. Code Part 742: The Tiered
Approach to Corrective Action Objectives, called TACO.
As stipulated by the CCDD law, benzo(a)pyrene is the only carcinogenic chemical
for which TACO background values may be applied in the new regulations; other
carcinogenic polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons and the chemical arsenic may not
use background concentrations. Illinois EPA is proposing that background concentrations be allowed for non-carcinogenic chemicals.
Background values for benzo(a)pyrene are based on the location of the fill site
where the soil is deposited; for the non-carcinogenic chemicals, the most
stringent background value is used.
Illinois EPA will post a table of the numerical standards for uncontaminated
soil on its website for easy reference. We are not proposing to list the
numerical standards in the rule because the values will change over time as new science,
such as toxicity data, becomes available. Rather, the rule describes how to determine the appropriate numerical standards from TACO. If we listed the
numerical standards in the regulations, a regulatory amendment would be needed
whenever the TACO cleanup objectives change.
A draft version of the table is now available for review:
TACO-Derived Maximum Allowable Concentrations of Chemical Constituents in
Uncontaminated Soil.
3. Sets operating requirements for uncontaminated soil fill operations.
While a permit is not required for uncontaminated soil fill operations, these
sites must now meet other requirements similar to those of CCDD facilities. Such
requirements include maintaining operating records; performing load-checking
activities; and completing procedures for closure and termination of postclosure
maintenance. These requirements will help protect uncontaminated soil fill
operations from receiving soil that is contaminated and help protect
groundwater.
4. Requires groundwater monitoring at CCDD facilities and uncontaminated soil
fill operations.
The CCDD law specifically called for the regulations to address groundwater
protection. Although load checking and certification requirements are designed
to help keep contaminants out of the fill material, Illinois EPA is proposing a
groundwater monitoring system requirement as an additional protection against
groundwater contamination. This is important because CCDD facilities and uncontaminated soil
fill operations are unlined.
The groundwater monitoring requirements are self-implementing. This means that
for CCDD facilities groundwater monitoring is not part of the facility permit,
and that for both types of fill operations no documentation is required to be submitted
to Illinois EPA unless groundwater contamination is detected. However, the draft
rule requires that fill operations employ a professional engineer to supervise both
the design of the groundwater monitoring system and the preparation of related
programs, plans and reports. Self-implementing requirements such as these are already in
use for on-site non-hazardous waste landfills under 35 Ill. Adm. Code Part 815.
The Part 1100 amendments require groundwater monitoring for the life of the fill
operation, including the closure and postclosure periods. The
fill operation must test annually for all constituents that have a Class I
groundwater quality standard listed in 35 Ill. Adm. Code 620.410.
If fill operations detect groundwater contamination above the Class I
groundwater quality standards, corrective action must be performed unless the
fill operation can show that the contamination is not caused by the fill
operation. Illinois EPA
is proposing that on-site corrective action achieve the numerical Class I groundwater quality
standards referenced above. Off-site corrective action must achieve compliance
with the applicable groundwater quality standards as well as the rest of 35 Ill. Adm.
Code 620, which includes the non-degradation provisions.
External Review of the Draft Rule for Clean Construction and Demolition
Debris
Illinois EPA released its draft proposed amendments to 35 Ill. Adm. Code Part
1100 to stakeholders on February, 17, 2011. The Agency received 88 pages of
comments from 24 stakeholder groups:
| • American Institute of Professional Geologists |
• Illinois Society of Professional Engineers |
| • American Public Works Association – Chicago Metro Chapter |
• JAS Environmental, Inc. |
| • Chicago Public Building Commission |
• Land Reclamation and Recycling Association |
| • Chicago Street CCDD |
• National Solid Wastes Management Association |
| • Forest Preserve District of Will County |
• Naval Facilities Engineering Command Midwest |
| • Illinois Association of Aggregate Producers |
• Professional Geologists of Indiana, Inc. |
| • Illinois Association of County Engineers |
• Suburban Public Works Directors Association |
| • Illinois Attorney General’s Office |
• Vulcan Materials Company |
| • Illinois Department of Transportation |
• Waste Management of Illinois, Inc. |
| • Illinois Groundwater Association |
• Will County |
| • Illinois Landscape Contractors Association |
• Wills Burke Kelsey Associates, Inc. |
| • Illinois Road and Transportation Builders Association |
|
Illinois EPA appreciates the comments, issues and concerns raised by CCDD
stakeholders, especially given the short deadline of March 11, 2011. The
stakeholders’ careful review of the draft proposal has improved our approach to
managing CCDD and uncontaminated soil.
Key Changes to the Draft Rule
-
Provided for Professional Geologists to certify that soil is uncontaminated
Illinois EPA’s revised draft rule extends the signature authority of the
uncontaminated soil certification form to professional geologists. On July 14,
2011, Governor Quinn signed HB 3371 into law as
Public
Act 97-137. This law allows Professional Geologists to provide
certifications in addition to Professional Engineers under the interim soil
certification requirements.
Some commenters requested that geologists also be recognized under Part 1100,
Subpart G: Groundwater Monitoring. Illinois EPA invites stakeholders to provide
legal, regulatory and/or technical justification to expand the role of
professional geologists in implementing Part 1100.
- Replaced “industrial/commercial” with “potentially impacted property”
The term “industrial/commercial,” is closely identified with zoning designations
and, as a result, has caused confusion among stakeholders. The law’s intention
was to identify soil that is more likely to be contaminated and in need of
professional evaluation and certification before placement within a fill site. To better align with
the purpose of the certification requirement and to give more flexibility to
source site owners and operators, receiving facilities, contractors and
environmental professionals, Illinois EPA has created a new term, “potentially
impacted property.” As defined in the revised draft rule, “potentially impacted
property” means property on which historical or current use increases the
presence or potential presence of contamination. Illinois EPA deleted specific
reference to rights of way and easements because the term “potentially impacted
property” can be applied directly to these land uses.
Please note that during the interim period before the CCDD rule is adopted, the
use of “industrial/commercial” is required by law and existing forms, LPC-662
and LPC-663, must still be used.
-
Revised the definition of “other excavation”
This term has long been problematic and several stakeholders requested
clarification. Illinois EPA has expanded the definition as follows: “other
excavation” means a pit created primarily for the purpose of extracting
resources (e.g., soil, sand, gravel, clay) and does not include holes, trenches,
or similar earth removal created as part of normal construction, removal, or
maintenance of a structure, utility, or transportation infrastructure.
Illinois EPA Seeking Specific Comments
Illinois EPA would like feedback from stakeholders on one particular issue of
concern. To be most effective, stakeholders should provide this input in the
form of proposed regulatory language along with the underlying reasoning for the
proposed solution.
How should the regulations address situations where an inspected load
accompanied by a P.E. or P.G. certification is rejected because of a positive
PID reading?
Under Section 1100.205, the draft rule requires fill sites to perform a load
checking inspection using a PID instrument. Any PID reading in excess of
background levels must result in rejection of the inspected load. A number of
stakeholders have commented that a professional engineer’s certification of
uncontaminated soil (when accompanied by lab analytical results) should take
precedence over the PID reading. Please consider in your discussion that neither
approach is likely to be 100 percent accurate and the relative consequences of
error to the P.E. or P.G., the client and the fill site owner and operator.
Full List of Draft Rule Changes (identified by citation)
| 1100.103 |
Revised definitions for “carcinogen,” “CCDD,” “compliance point,”
“other excavation,” and “uncontaminated soil.”
Added definitions for “aquifer,” ”compliance boundary,” “potentially impacted
property,” “Professional Geologist,” “representative groundwater conditions,”
“site of origin” and “uppermost aquifer.”
Deleted definitions for “commercial/industrial” and "zone of attenuation.” |
| 1100.205(a)(1)(A) |
Provides for certification by source site owner or operator that
site is not a potentially impacted property. |
| 1100.205(a)(1)(B) |
Allows Professional Geologists to certify that soil is
uncontaminated. |
| 1100.205(a)(3) |
Removed statutory language also found in Subpart F section
1100.603(d). |
| 1100.412(c)(1)(D) |
Added that three years of groundwater monitoring must be under
representative groundwater conditions. Added Board note per Section
1100.715(a) that facilities have one year to install groundwater
monitoring systems. |
| 1100.507(d) |
Same change as above but applied to uncontaminated soil fill
operations: Added that three years of groundwater monitoring must be
under representative groundwater conditions. Added Board note per
Section 1100.715(a) that facilities have one year to install groundwater
monitoring systems. |
| 1100.601(a) |
Simplified/clarified “Purpose” section. |
| 1100.601(d)(2) |
Allows exception from soil treatment prohibition for soil physically
separated from construction or demolition debris at the site where
generated or at a site authorized by permit or other law to perform such
treatment of construction or demolition debris. |
| 1100.601(d)(3) |
Further clarifies that soil from a site where cleanup or removal of
contaminants is performed may be taken to a fill operation if the soil
is not part of the cleanup or remediation and is otherwise
uncontaminated. |
| 1100.602(a) |
Clarified TACO table references for maximum allowable concentrations
for chemical constituents in uncontaminated soil. |
| 1100.602(b)(1),(b)(2) |
Revises provisions allowing limited use of background values from 35
Ill. Adm. Code 742.Appendix A, Tables G and H as maximum allowable
concentrations (MACs) to state that the use of background values is
not location-specific, and that, except for benzo(a)pyrene, only the most
stringent chemical-specific background values from the tables may be used as
MACs regardless of the location of the fill operation. |
| 1100.603(b) |
Moved subsection (b) to (a) and (a) to (b); added that the chemical
constituents to be evaluated must be determined on a site-specific
basis; and inserted reference to Professional Geologist. |
| 1100.603(d) |
Added “chain of custody control” to sampling documentation
requirements. |
| 1100.720(c) |
Revised language on compliance point(s). |
| 1100.725(a) |
Added requirement that the groundwater system must be installed to
monitor groundwater conditions at the fill site. |
| 1100.730(e) |
Revised the conditions under which the requirements of the
groundwater monitoring program are no longer met. |
| 1100.740 |
Added language requiring collection of groundwater samples from all
wells. |
| 1100.745(b) |
Revised language so that fill operations pursuing an alternative
noncompliance response under 1100.750 need not meet the resampling requirement. |
| 1100.750(a) and (b) |
Revised language to allow report to be submitted with
regard to Illinois EPA notification of exceedance in 1100.745(a) instead of from
resampling event in 1100.745(b). |
| 1100.755(b) |
Revised language to allow corrective action to demonstrate that the
fill operation does not contribute to an exceedance of the Class I groundwater
quality standards. |
Overview of the Draft Rule
(Added February 17, 2011)
Proposed Amendments to 35 IAC Part 1100
(Added February 17, 2011)
Overview of Changes to the Draft Rule
(Added April 29, 2011)
Revised Proposed Amendments to 35 IAC Part 1100
(Added April 29, 2011)
Proposed Table of TACO-Derived Maximum Allowable Chemical
Constituents in Uncontaminated Soil (Added April
29, 2011)
Background
Clean construction or demolition debris (CCDD) is uncontaminated broken concrete without protruding metal bars, bricks, rock, stone, or
reclaimed asphalt pavement generated from construction or demolition activities. When uncontaminated soil is mixed with any of these materials,
the uncontaminated soil is also considered CCDD. Uncontaminated soil that is not mixed with other CCDD materials is not CCDD. What constitutes
uncontaminated soil has not been defined previously in the environmental laws or regulations.
When CCDD is used as fill it is not considered to be a waste as long as: 1) the filled area is not within the setback zone of a drinking water
well; 2) the CCDD is placed below grade; and 3) within 30 days after filling is complete, the CCDD is covered with uncontaminated soil, pavement,
or some type of structure. Since 2008, filling quarries, mines, and other excavations with CCDD has required a permit from the Illinois EPA’s Bureau
of Land. Filling quarries, mines, and other excavations with only uncontaminated soil has previously not required any permitting by or registration
with the Illinois EPA’s Bureau of Land.
More than 60 CCDD fill sites are currently permitted by the Illinois EPA.
New Public Act
Public Act 96-1416, effective
July 30, 2010, (modified July 14, 2011) makes the following changes:
- Owners and operators of
uncontaminated soil fill operations are required
to register with the Illinois EPA’s Bureau of Land. Soil fill operations
that received soil prior to July 30, 2010 must register by March 31,
2011. Soil fill operations that first receive uncontaminated soil on or
after July 30, 2010 must register before
accepting any uncontaminated soil.
- Owners and operators of CCDD and uncontaminated soil fill operations are
required to:
- record hauler, address of source site, owner/operator of source site,
weight/volume, and date-received information for each load of CCDD or
uncontaminated soil accepted;
- obtain for all soil: certification from the owner or operator of the site of
origin that the site has never been used for commercial or industrial purposes
and is presumed to be uncontaminated soil; or certification from a licensed
professional engineer or licensed professional geologist that the soil is uncontaminated.
- confirm that all uncontaminated soil accepted was not removed as part of a
cleanup or removal of contaminants;
- visually inspect each load of soil (already required of permitted CCDD fill
operations);
- screen each load of soil with a device such as photo ionization detector,
flame ionization detector, or another device approved by the Agency that detects
volatile organic compounds (already required of permitted CCDD fill operations);
- document all these activities; and
- maintain this documentation for each load of soil for at least 3 years after
the load was received.
Within one year after the effective date of the new CCDD law, the Illinois
EPA has to propose, and within two years the Illinois Pollution Control Board
has to adopt, rules defining uncontaminated soil by specifying the maximum
concentrations of contaminants that may be in uncontaminated soil.
Within one year after the effective date of the new CCDD law, the Illinois
EPA has to propose, and within two years the Illinois Pollution Control Board
has to adopt, rules defining uncontaminated soil fill operations that
include standards and procedures to protect groundwater.
The Illinois EPA must assess and collect a fee on CCDD and uncontaminated
soil accepted at CCDD fill operations. The state tipping fee for CCDD fill sites
is set at 20 cents per cubic yard or 14 cents per ton of material received at
such sites. Proceeds will be used by Illinois EPA for inspection and enforcement
activities related to the use of CCDD and uncontaminated soil as fill. In
addition to the State fee, the law authorizes local governments (counties) that
inspect CCDD fill sites under delegation agreements with Illinois EPA to impose
their own local tipping fee of up to 10 cents per cubic yard or 7 cents per ton
of material received at CCDD fill sites. No state or local tipping fees are
imposed on “soil-only” sites under this law.
In addition to their regular enforcement authorities, Illinois EPA as well as
counties with delegation agreements are authorized to issue administrative
citations (ACs) for violations of the CCDD requirements.
Immediate Changes
Interim Requirements
Until the effective date of the Illinois Pollution Control Board rules, owners
and operators of CCDD fill operations and soil-only fill operations must comply
with the following interim requirements:
- Document the following information for each load of CCDD or uncontaminated
soil received:
- Hauler name, site of origin address, owner or operator of the site of origin;
- Weight in tons or volume in cubic yards; and
- Date received.
- Obtain for all soil:
- Certification from the owner or operator of the site of origin that the site
has never been used for commercial or industrial purposes and is presumed to be
uncontaminated soil; or
- Certification from a licensed professional engineer or licensed
professional geologist that the soil is uncontaminated.
- Confirm that the CCDD or uncontaminated soil was not removed from a site as part of a cleanup or removal.
- Visually inspect and screen each load of soil with a device such as photo ionization detector, flame ionization detector, or another device approved by
the Agency that detects volatile organic compounds (already required of permitted CCDD fill operations);
- Document all activities under the Interim Requirements. Documentation of any chemical analysis must include, without limitation:
- Copy of the lab analysis;
- Laboratory accreditation status; and
- Laboratory authorized agent certification.
Source Site Certification by Owner
or Operator LPC-662
(Updated July 18, 2011)
Uncontaminated Soil
Certification by Licensed Professional Engineer or Licensed Professional
Geologist LPC-663
(Updated July 18, 2011)
Uncontaminated Soil
Fill Operation Registration Form by Owner and/or Operator LPC-665
IEPA/IDOT Intergovernmental
Agreement
IEPA/IDOT
Intergovernmental Agreement Extension (through December 31, 2011)
(Added June 28, 2011)
IEPA/IDOT
Intergovernmental Agreement Extension
(Added January 11,
2012)
For a summary of how the new law affects the management of CCDD,
please see the Illinois EPA
training slides presented in August and September 2010 during informational
sessions held for CCDD stakeholders.
Fee collection
Illinois EPA has established the CCDD fee regulations at
35
Ill. Adm. Code 1150
effective December 22, 2010. The rules replace the emergency rules that
have been in effect since August 2, 2010.
CCDD Fee Form
CCDD Monthly Tons Record
Section 22.15b of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act (P.A. 96-1416)
requires the Illinois EPA to collect a fee from the owners and operators of a
CCDD fill operation and requires the Illinois EPA to establish rules relating to
the collection of the fees. The Illinois EPA's Part 1150 CCDD Fee Rules
set forth the procedures for the collection of fees from the owner or
operator of a CCDD fill operation, including recordkeeping requirements,
submittals to the Illinois EPA, and time and manner of payment. Questions
regarding the CCDD fees should be directed to the Illinois EPA, Bureau of Land,
Waste Reduction and Compliance Section, at 217-785-8604.
FAQs
CCDD Fee
QA1. When should fill operators begin collecting fees?
AA1. On the effective date of the new CCDD law, July 30, 2010. For fee questions
only, operators should contact the Illinois EPA, Bureau of Land, Waste Reduction
and Compliance Section at 217-785-8604.
QA2. What options do CCDD fill operators have in assessing the fee?
AA2. CCDD fill operators may measure the quantity of material received at their
sites by either 1) weight, in tons, where the operator has weighed the CCDD or
uncontaminated soil received with a device for which certification has been
obtained under the Weights and Measures Act [225 ILCS 470], or 2) volume, in
cubic yards, based on the known capacity of the hauling vehicle.
QA3. Does the CCDD fee apply to government or tax-exempt entities, such as
municipalities?
AA3. Yes. The fee applies to CCDD or uncontaminated soil if 1) the CCDD fill
operation is located off the site where the CCDD or uncontaminated soil was
generated, and 2) the CCDD fill operation is owned, controlled, and operated by
a person other than the source site owner or operator of the CCDD or uncontaminated soil. It doesn't
matter whether the source site owner or operator is a tax-exempt entity.
(Revised January 18, 2011)
Soil Certifications
QB1. Under the Interim Requirements, what numeric criteria should licensed
Professional Engineers rely on in making the uncontaminated soil certification
for placement of soil in CCDD fill operations?
AB1. Historically, Illinois EPA has referenced the numerical standards listed in
35 Ill. Adm. Code 742, Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives (TACO),
comparing soil samples to the most stringent soil remediation objective of all
exposure routes in the Tier 1 residential and industrial/commercial tables for
the contaminants of concern (Part 742, Appendix B, Tables A, B). For further
reference, see Item 3 on page 2 of the
Intergovernmental Agreement entered into
between Illinois EPA and Illinois Department of Transportation on
Aug. 3, 2010.
QB2. Are background levels allowed in determining whether soil is uncontaminated
when used as fill material in a current or former quarry, mine or other
excavation?
AB2. As noted in AB1 above, Illinois EPA has historically referenced the TACO
standards, which includes the use of background levels. During the interim
period, the Agency intends to use this same approach.
QB3. What laboratory methods and sampling protocol should be used for soils
analysis?
AB3. As specified in the new CCDD law, chemical analyses must be conducted in
accordance with “Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods” U.S. EPA Publication No. SW-846 as amended.
The appropriate sampling protocol will depend on the site and the suspected
contaminants; this decision should be made by the licensed Professional Engineer
who is responsible for certifying that the soil is uncontaminated. You may want
to work with your trade organization or professional association to develop a
consensus approach during the interim period.
QB4. Does each load need a certification form, or is one certification form per
job site acceptable?
AB4. The source site owner or operator or professional engineer should
coordinate with the receiving facility in advance to make sure all soil received
is properly certified. In many cases, one certification form per job site will
be sufficient. (Revised January 18, 2011).
QB5. If consolidating soil from different areas for stockpiling until ready to
send a full truckload to a CCDD facility or soil only fill operation, what
address should be used for the certification form? (e.g., a municipal public
works department consolidating soil from multiple water line breaks.)
AB5. If using a source site certification form, the addresses where the soil
originated should be listed. If using a professional engineer certification
form, the address of the location of the stockpiled soil should be listed (e.g.,
a municipal public works yard). In both instances, the source site owner or
operator or professional engineer should
coordinate with the receiving facility. (Revised
January 18, 2011).
QB6. Who must sign the source site certification from LPC-662?
AB6. LPC-662 must be signed by either the source site owner or
operator. (Added January 18, 2011)
Load Checking/Rejected Loads
QC1. What are the requirements regarding the use of PIDs (photo ionization
detectors) by CCDD facilities and soil only fill operations?
AC1. Current regulations concerning load checking and documentation at permitted CCDD facilities contain the following requirements specific to PIDs:
35 Ill. Adm. Code Part 1100.205(a)(1)(A): An inspector designated by the
facility must inspect every load before its acceptance at the facility utilizing
an elevated structure, a designated ground level inspection area, or another
acceptable method as specified in the Agency permit. In addition to a visual
inspection, the inspector must use an instrument with a photo ionization
detector utilizing a lamp of 10.6 eV or greater or an instrument with a flame
ionization detector, or other monitoring devices approved by the Agency, to
inspect each load. All instruments shall be interpreted based on the
manufacturer’s margin of error. Any reading in excess of background levels using
any of these instruments must result in the rejection of the inspected load. In
addition, any reading in excess of background levels on any monitoring device
used by the Agency during an Agency inspection must result in the rejection of
the inspected load.
For soil only fill operations, Illinois EPA is authorized by the new CCDD law to
apply the same requirements as listed above.
QC2. What happens if the PID instrument at the CCDD facility or soil only fill
operation detects volatile contaminants in soil that has been certified by a
professional engineer and is accompanied by laboratory analytical results
demonstrating that the soil is uncontaminated? Would the analytical results take
precedence over the PID reading?
AC2. No. CCDD facilities are required by the terms of their permit to reject any
load that results in a PID reading above background level.
QC3. My CCDD materials, including soil, were rejected at the CCDD facility. What
happens next? AC3. The CCDD facility is required to submit a
Load Rejection Form to Illinois EPA by the end of the same business day that the load is rejected.
The facility must also notify the driver in writing of four items: 1) only CCDD
is accepted for use as fill at the facility; 2) the material contains or is
suspected to contain material other than CCDD, it must not be taken to another
CCDD fill operation, and it must be properly recycled or disposed of at a
permitted landfill; 3)for all loads, the CCDD facility must record: the name of
the hauling firm, the name of the driver, the vehicle ID number or license
plate, and the source of the fill, and must make this information available to
Illinois EPA for inspection; and 4) the Illinois EPA will be informed that the
load has been rejected.
Rejected loads must not be returned to the site of origin for disposal. However,
rejected loads may be stored temporarily at the site of origin while waiting for
waste characterization. Until removal of the rejected load, precautions should
be taken to prevent contamination of both surface water and groundwater. One
acceptable option would be to place the material on and cover it with Visqueen
(plastic sheeting). For more information, consult the list of
Contaminated Load Rejection
Frequently Asked Questions.
Please note: The CCDD facility or soil only fill operation may reject any load
at their own discretion. The responsibility falls to them to make sure only CCDD
and uncontaminated soil are accepted for fill.
Definitions/Applicability
QD1. What fill sites are covered by the new CCDD law (P.A.96-1416)?
AD1. Current or former mines, quarries, other excavations. “Other excavation”
means a pit created primarily for the purpose of extracting resources (e.g.
soil, sand, gravel, clay) and does not include holes, trenches, or similar earth
removal created as part of normal construction, removal, or maintenance of a
structure, utility, or transportation infrastructure. (Revised
April 29, 2011).
QD2. Please clarify “other excavations.” AD2. Here are a few examples where Illinois EPA has previously determined that
soil placement or filling is not subject to CCDD fees, permitting or
registration. Other excavations do not include: filling in basements,
backfilling a cleanup site, installing or maintaining sewer trenches, or filling
in natural depressions. This list is not exhaustive. If in doubt about your
particular project, please contact the Illinois EPA, Bureau of Land, Permit
Section at 217-524-3300.
QD3. What does the definition of “uncontaminated soil” apply to? AD3. For purposes of the new CCDD law, this definition applies only to soil that
is generated from construction or demolition activities and used as fill
material at CCDD facilities and soil only fill operations.
QD4. What is “industrial/commercial property”? AD4. When the CCDD law became effective, Illinois EPA advised using the
“industrial/commercial property” definition from 35 Ill. Adm. Code 742, Tiered
Approach to Corrective Action Objectives (TACO), which classified any real
property that does not meet the definition of residential property, conservation
property or agricultural property as industrial/commercial. Illinois EPA cited
the TACO definition because no regulatory definition specific to the CCDD law is
yet available. Continued use of the TACO definitions is acceptable to Illinois
EPA, though coordination with the receiving facility in advance of soil
certification is recommended when the land use may be debatable.
With its April 29, 2011 revised proposed rule, Illinois EPA replaces the “industrial/commercial
property” definition with "potentially impacted property." This new
definition will best align with the law’s intention of
identifying soils that are more likely to be contaminated. In the Interim
period, “industrial/commercial” must still be used; however, it is open to interpretation and the decision as to
which soil certification form to use (source site certification or professional
engineer certification) should be made by the source site owner or operator and
the receiving facility. (Revised April 29, 2011)
QD5. How should soil within a public roadway right-of-way be classified?
AD5. Please see the response to AD4 above. In the Interim period, the
following should be considered when determining whether soil within a
transportation right-of-way or a utility easement has been used for
industrial/commercial purposes: 1) the current use of the property as a
right-of-way or easement, 2) the uses of the property prior to its use as a
right-of-way or easement, and 3) the uses of adjoining property.
(Revised May 18, 2011)
QD6. Is dredged material considered to be “soil generated from construction or
demolition activities”? AD6. Originally, the Illinois EPA held the
position that dredged materials (sediment or soil) should be categorically
excluded from CCDD fill operations and soil only fill operations.
Recognizing that in some cases dredged materials may be CCDD or uncontaminated
soil generated from construction or demolition activities, the Illinois EPA's
revised draft rules do not categorically exclude dredged materials from CCDD
fill operations and soil-only fill operations. However, because some
dredged materials may present odor problems, the revised draft rules require the
rejection of loads exhibiting foul odors. (Revised April
29, 2011)
QD7. May fill operators accept CCDD materials or uncontaminated soil from
cleanup sites, such as those regulated by the Leaking Underground Storage Tank
Section or the Site Remediation Program? AD7. Yes, if the material is not removed as part of a cleanup or removal of
contaminants (e.g., fill operators may accept clean overburden or other on-site
soil or material that does not require excavation or treatment as part of the
remediation activities).
QD8. Does the new CCDD law ban the placement of uncontaminated soil in
farm fields or other areas?
AD8. No. Uncontaminated soil may be used as fill material anywhere, aside
from mines, quarries, and other excavations subject to P.A.96-1416, so long as:
1) the soil is uncontaminated, 2) the filling doesn’t cause a water pollution
hazard per 12(a) and (d) of the Act, and 3) the filling doesn’t violate other
laws or cause other problems. No soil certification forms are required to use
uncontaminated soil as fill in areas not subject to P.A.96-1416.
(Added February 7, 2011)
Facility Inspections
QE1. What common violations are noted by Illinois EPA inspectors at CCDD
facilities?
AE1. Here are three examples.
- Recordkeeping: records are not kept at the location specified in the permit;
- Load checking: the facility doesn’t perform a daily PID examination of one dumped load and document the results; and
- Non-CCDD: the facility accepts non-CCDD materials, such as rebar or lumber.
For a more comprehensive list of potential violations, see the Inspection
Checklists:
CCDD Inspection Checklist
Uncontaminated Soil
Fill Operation Checklist
For More Information
Bureau of Land Permit Section
217-524-3300
|
|