Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives (TACO)
Fact Sheet 8: Pathway Exclusion
Introduction
Pathway exclusion is optional under TACO.
Pathway exclusion allows for the exclusion of an exposure route based on incompleteness
of the route. Incompleteness means that the pathway is unable to transport contaminants to
potential receptors. When the pathway exclusion requirements are met, you no longer need
remediation objectives for that particular pathway. Exclusion of any exposure route
requires an institutional control (See Fact
Sheet 4) and may also require an engineered barrier (See Fact Sheet 5).
Minimum Requirements
The following two requirements, if applicable, must be met before pathway exclusion can
be considered at a site:
The attenuation capacity of the soil and the soil saturation limit
cannot be exceeded. This prevents free product and potentially unacceptable risks from
either single or multiple contaminants from remaining in the soil. The attenuation
determination is made by comparing the sum of all remaining organic contaminants from a
single sample to the site-specific or default values for naturally occurring organic
carbon of the soil (foc). The soil saturation limit is determined by using
either Appendix A, Table A or by calculating a specific value from equation S29.
To prevent leaving behind materials with the potential impact of
hazardous waste, soils cannot exhibit characteristics of reactivity or have a pH equal to
or less than 2.0 or a pH greater than or equal to 12.5. Also, soil containing the
following inorganics or their salts must not exhibit characteristics of toxicity: arsenic,
barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, or silver.
Pathway Exclusion
Subpart C sets forth the requirements for demonstrating that an exposure route is
incomplete.
The three routes addressed in this Subpart are inhalation, soil ingestion and
groundwater ingestion (which includes migration to groundwater). The "pathway
exclusion" option in TACO can take into account natural conditions and/or engineered
barriers and institutional controls.
Although Subpart C presents prescriptive requirements to pathway exclusion, Tier 3 is
also an option for pathway exclusion under site-specific conditions not addressed in
Subpart C.
Before any pathways can be excluded, the extent and concentrations of the contaminants
of concern above the Tier 1 residential objectives must be known. The requirements for
this characterization may vary by program within the BOL.
Excluding the Inhalation Pathway
To exclude the inhalation pathway, the contaminants of concern must not exceed the Tier
1 inhalation objectives within ten feet of the land surface or within ten feet of any
man-made migration pathways (e.g., utility conduit). The ten foot requirement can,
however, be modified by the BOL if an adequate engineered barrier is utilized.
If the inhalation pathway is to be excluded, an institutional control must be in place
which satisfies all of the following:
Soils exceeding Tier 1 levels will not be located or relocated to
positions within ten feet of the surface or within ten feet of any man-made pathway,
Safety precautions will be taken for future construction worker
populations if the remaining levels exceed the construction worker scenario objectives for
inhalation, and
The engineered barrier will be maintained when it is relied upon for the
objectives used.
Excluding the Ingestion Pathway
To exclude the ingestion pathway, the contaminants of concern must not exceed the Tier
1 ingestion objectives within three feet of the land surface. This three foot requirement
can, however, be modified by the BOL if an adequate engineered barrier is utilized.
If the ingestion pathway is to be excluded, an institutional control must be in place
which satisfies all of the following:
Soils exceeding Tier 1 levels will not be located or relocated to
positions within three feet of the land surface,
Safety precautions will be taken for future construction worker
populations if the remaining levels exceed the construction worker scenario objectives for
ingestion, and
The engineered barrier will be maintained when it is relied upon for the
objectives used.
Excluding the Ingestion of Groundwater Pathway
To exclude the groundwater ingestion pathway, you must demonstrate that the groundwater
in the area of the release will not be consumed as drinking water, and that contamination
will not migrate to a location where it could be consumed. This demonstration must show
the following:
Free product has been removed to the extent practicable,
The source of the release is not within a setback zone or a regulated
recharge area of a potable water supply well,
All areas within 2,500 feet of the source of the release are governed by
an ordinance adopted by a unit of local government that prohibits the use of groundwater
as a potable water supply,
Using equation R26 in Appendix C, Table C, all contaminants will meet
the Tier 1 objective at the nearest setback zone, and
Using equation R26, any contaminated groundwater discharging to a
surface water body will meet the surface water quality standards under 35 IAC 302.
Can I exclude the migration to groundwater pathway?
Yes. Under Tier 3, if you can't exclude the ingestion of groundwater pathway as
discussed above, you can demonstrate that there is no actual or potential impact of
contaminants to receptors from the migration to groundwater route. Or, you can propose to
exclude the migration to groundwater route. Such a proposal must contain the following
information:
Description of the route,
Descriptions of the chemical and physical properties of the
contaminants,
Contaminant migration properties,
Descriptions of the site and its physical characteristics,
Discussion of why the route is unlikely to become active in the future,
and
Any modeling or engineered barriers, if applicable.
Can pathway exclusion be used in the LUST Program?
Yes. Subpart C of TACO may be applied in two ways under the LUST Program:
You may use the exposure pathway exclusion under 732.312 as site
classification Method Three, or
If your site is classified as high priority under Method One or Method
Two, you may use Subpart C of TACO in developing a corrective action approach.
|